What do all art reviews and critiques have in common? They all flounder when trying to explain a rule/concept used in a piece of art, and can't usually do it in less than 800 words.
on the rare occasion that they do nail a rule which the artist has used- no one agrees or acknowledges them.
Oh- and they forget what they're talking about. What am I talking about- just read any art critique's "work" and you will see.
Look at these really weird photos. A fine example of freelance art, which, in my opinion should display a certain amount of controlled mayhem. A resemblance and the authors physche; how long he had to go without antidepressants for to create his work.
Well, I think these photos qualify whatever your spec. or tastes are...
I am trying to get hold of the rest, apparently there is a set, lets hope they're as impressive as these...
here's another
Unknown Artist
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment